How many times have you said to
the wife, children or a friend 'take my car' and not thought any more of it?
Even if it's just a short trip down the road to the shops, you and the person
you lend your car to, may be breaking the law! Furthermore if the person you
lend the car to, in turn lends the car to another, you will be held liable for
any damages caused by the other party, whether you were aware of their use or
not.
If you own a car and decide to
lend it to another person, it is your responsibility to check that the person
you lend it to have adequate car insurance and that their cover extends to
driving other vehicles. If you fail to make reasonable checks to verify these
details you could be liable for subsequent damage that the person you lent it to
causes, and indeed, you may find yourself on the end of a police prosecution
for allowing an uninsured driver to use a motor vehicle contrary of section 143
of the Road Traffic Act. It is also you responsibility to ensure that the
person you lend it to does not permit others to drive it.
In the United Kingdom, this
principle was first established in UK law back in 1934 in the case of Monk v
Warbey and Others. Mr Warbey owned a car which was insured to permit driving by
himself and other members of his family. He lent it to his friend Mr Knowles
who in turn lent it to a Mr May to drive. At some time during use of the car Mr
May was involved in an accident for which he was deemed responsible, with a car
driven by Mr Monk. Neither May nor Mr Knowles had insurance for third party
risks and neither had the means or funds to satisfy the judgement in court
against them. It was held that Mr Warbey had originally committed a breach of
duty of sub section 1 of section 143 of the Road Traffic Act, by parting with the
control of the car to a person who was not insured, and he was therefore held
liable for all damages and costs.
It was found in court that Mr
Warbey had been informed prior to parting with the Vehicle that neither Mr
Knowles nor Mr May had adequate car insurance covering third party risks and
had taken no steps to remedy this. Counsel for Warbey argued that the car
accident involving May was too far removed from Warbey's breach of the statute
to make Warbey liable for damages to the third party. The Judge disagreed and
Warbey was found liable, and the principle enacted by this case remains in UK
law to the current day. Up until this point in time the Act did not extend
liability to users of cars to third parties, beyond the requirements of common
law, but the decision in this particular case imposes upon the owner of a car,
whether they have car insurance or not, an additional duty to injured third
parties and enables any third party to recover damages from the car owner who
permits his car to be used in such a way, knowingly or not.
The only exception to this rule
is in the case of employees using a car owned by their employer, where the
person driving the car had reasonable grounds to believe that insurance was in
force when the used the car.
It would therefore be very
prudent if you checked the levels of cover of your own car insurance policy
before agreeing to the use of your vehicle by another, and indeed certify that
they are covered by either your own or their current car insurance. Failure to
do so could land you in the courts!
Dave Healey is a specialist motor
underwiter who has been underwriting car insurance policies and in particular
classic car insurance polices at Lloyds for over thirty years.
Article Source:
http://EzineArticles.com/expert/Dave_Healey/287629
Rapidly this kind of internet site can easily unquestionably recognition among virtually all blogging and site-building and also site-building individuals, to be able to the meticulous content or simply opinions. Leihhaus Bochum
ReplyDelete